Security Methodology

How the SOC classifies posture: the severity model, on-chain evidence sources, the posture-vs-exploit distinction, and change detection.

Read-only · live

Severity model

Evidence sources

Posture risk vs. exploit

Every finding here is a posture risk: a capability that an authorized party could exercise given the contract's current on-chain state. A posture finding is not a claim that the capability has been misused, that funds are at risk, or that an exploit exists. Language is deliberately neutral and evidence-based; the SOC never accuses an operator of wrongdoing.

Example: an upgradeable proxy is reported as a posture risk because the proxy admin can change the implementation behind a fixed address. That is a trust and governance consideration — the correct response is to confirm the admin is a Safe or timelock and to monitor the implementation slot, not to assume malicious intent.

Change detection

Two layers operate independently. Posture evaluation derives findings from a contract's current state and is what this console shows live. Change detection compares a stored baseline against the current state and raises SEV-1/SEV-2 alerts on proxy upgrades (implementation changed), proxy-admin changes, owner changes, Safe threshold changes, and newly-added mint capabilities.

Change detection requires a baseline store and runs in the monitoring job rather than in the read-only API. When no baseline is available, only current posture is reported — this limitation is stated rather than hidden.